<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is There Life Between TFT LCD and Electrophoretic?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.displaysearchblog.com/2009/06/is-there-life-between-tft-lcd-and-electrophoretic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.displaysearchblog.com/2009/06/is-there-life-between-tft-lcd-and-electrophoretic/</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of DisplaySearch, an NPD Group Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Barnes</title>
		<link>http://www.displaysearchblog.com/2009/06/is-there-life-between-tft-lcd-and-electrophoretic/comment-page-1/#comment-1259</link>
		<dc:creator>David Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 00:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.displaysearchblog.com/?p=584#comment-1259</guid>
		<description>Several other demonstrations at the conference show ways to cut power consumption significantly while delivering full-color video using conventional TFT LCD processes. I think Pixel Qi is on to something important. I hope her efforts will spur others to take LCD to the next level of performance and price. 

As I explained in the Business Conference, TFT LCD suppliers are cautious people in some ways because they gamble so much on each fab investment. Sometimes, smaller companies must be the ones to show suppliers how displays could serve us better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several other demonstrations at the conference show ways to cut power consumption significantly while delivering full-color video using conventional TFT LCD processes. I think Pixel Qi is on to something important. I hope her efforts will spur others to take LCD to the next level of performance and price. </p>
<p>As I explained in the Business Conference, TFT LCD suppliers are cautious people in some ways because they gamble so much on each fab investment. Sometimes, smaller companies must be the ones to show suppliers how displays could serve us better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://www.displaysearchblog.com/2009/06/is-there-life-between-tft-lcd-and-electrophoretic/comment-page-1/#comment-1256</link>
		<dc:creator>John Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.displaysearchblog.com/?p=584#comment-1256</guid>
		<description>Miss Jepsen told this analyst that they had already validated their power and sunlight readability claims by retrofitting a mini-note PC they purchased. She also said that the Pixel Qi display would be shipping in a mini-note PC later this year, though she declined to state the brand(s).   If Pixel Qi can bring this display to market, and at a price comparable to TFT LCD, then it would solve one of the biggest complaints of mini-notes, their poor battery life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miss Jepsen told this analyst that they had already validated their power and sunlight readability claims by retrofitting a mini-note PC they purchased. She also said that the Pixel Qi display would be shipping in a mini-note PC later this year, though she declined to state the brand(s).   If Pixel Qi can bring this display to market, and at a price comparable to TFT LCD, then it would solve one of the biggest complaints of mini-notes, their poor battery life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

