<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cross License: Samsung &amp; Sharp Agree to Stop Suing Each Other</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.displaysearchblog.com/2010/02/cross-license-samsung-sharp-agree-to-stop-suing-each-other/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.displaysearchblog.com/2010/02/cross-license-samsung-sharp-agree-to-stop-suing-each-other/</link>
	<description>The Official Blog of DisplaySearch, an NPD Group Company</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 04:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Barnes</title>
		<link>http://www.displaysearchblog.com/2010/02/cross-license-samsung-sharp-agree-to-stop-suing-each-other/comment-page-1/#comment-3315</link>
		<dc:creator>David Barnes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 21:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.displaysearchblog.com/?p=1145#comment-3315</guid>
		<description>Charles, did you notice that the settlement was announced four days (US time) after Commissioners with the US International Trade Commission ordered an investigation of Samsung pursuant to 337-TA-702 (the case filed by Sharp on Jan 8th)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles, did you notice that the settlement was announced four days (US time) after Commissioners with the US International Trade Commission ordered an investigation of Samsung pursuant to 337-TA-702 (the case filed by Sharp on Jan 8th)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

